《Tetrabiblos》The Number Of Prorogators, And Also The Part Of FortuneClaudius Ptolemy（Ashmand 英譯 1822）
[146] Placidus, in remarking on the nativity of John di Colonna, after stating his opinion that it is an error to suppose that a malign influence to the horoscope, when the horoscope has _not_ the primary signification of life is anæretic, says, that “the order and method which Ptolemy lays down for the election of a prorogator are quite absurd, unless life be at the disposal of a sole prime significator only.” He proves by other arguments also, and by instances of the fact, that “_one only_ signifies life, elected according to Ptolemy’s method.” (Cooper’s translation, p.
段落 tetra-3-thenumbero-16public-domain (Ashmand 1822)
↗ 開啟公有領域原文（Wikisource）此段為公有領域典籍逐字擷取，零 AI 生成；原文亦存繁化前底本，可逐字審計。我們寧可少引、不可錯引——驗不過的引文一律捨棄。